How would the New European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) affect you as an employer in APAC?
By Carlos Estrada, General Counsel, Asia Pacific
Technological developments entail significant challenges for the protection of personal data. In a world which rapid digitization, data flow has also increased faster than ever before. It is therefore unsurprising to see a global trend for stricter and far-reaching regulations with a paramount goal to enhance individuals’ privacy protection.
What is GDPR?
A good example of the above trend is the relatively recent General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (“GDPR”) which, not only increases the threshold of protective measures, but is also directly effective in all EU Member States, as opposed to the current Directive 95/46/EC (which will be repealed by GDPR) (“Directive”) which required country transposition.
When is GDPR effective?
GDPR will take effect on 25 May 2018 so, although there is still enough time for companies to adapt their internal processes accordingly, it is highly recommended to create awareness among the relevant stakeholders and initiate actions as soon as practicable.
Why is it applicable to you as a Company outside of the EU?
A significant difference between the Directive and GDPR is indeed the broader territorial reach of the latter versus the former. Particularly, Article 3 states that GDPR “(…) applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or (ii) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.” Therefore, this Article expressly states that GDPR applies to data controllers or processors even if established outside the EU.
Do data subjects need to be European?
Article 3 above does not specify whether data subjects’ nationality is determining but rather whether they “are” in the EU, thus, it refers to EU residents regardless of their nationality.
What does “Offering of goods and services to data subjects in the Union” mean?
This means that, for instance, the website of an HR company based in APAC (“APAC Company”) could be subjected to GDPR if it targets EU residents as potential candidates; even of it does not charge them any fees for such job search services (as expressly mentioned in the Article). The Court of Justice of the European Union has also already provided certain guidelines on this point and the determining factor is the company’s intention to target EU citizens, e.g. if the foreign company website mentioned Euro currency (e.g. in the job postings), offered multilingual options (comprising EU languages) or contained any other aspect which was intended for the exclusive benefit of EU residents; it would then be deemed to target such population, hence, such company would fall under GDPR’s umbrella.
What does “Monitoring of data subjects’ behaviour which takes place in the Union” mean?
Such situation could arise when, hypothetically, an APAC Company provides certain services to clients in the EU which comprise the managing of personnel based in the EU. This can be the case when, for instance, such APAC Company provides on-site services to an EU client whereby the APAC Company’s employs certain individuals under its supervision to provide services in the clients’ workplace based in the EU.
What shall I do if my company falls under one of the above two scenarios?
In the event that an APAC Company’s operations fall under any of the two abovementioned scenarios (i.e. offering services to candidates in EU or monitoring personnel’s behaviours taking place in the EU), the APAC Company (pursuant to GDPR’s Article 27) shall designate in writing a Representative in the Union.
How and who shall I appoint as Representative?
In order to officialise such appointment and ensure proper traceability in the future, the issuance of a board resolution by the foreign company might be advisable. GDPR does not specify whether such representative needs to be an employee of the company so we would argue that having an external provider (e.g. law firm or agent) would suffice.
Where the Representative shall be based?
The representative shall be established in the Member State where the data subjects are. This requirement could be relatively easy to apply if the APAC Company’s EU target population is clearly specified or if it is monitoring individuals’ behaviour in a specific country. However, it would be challenging if the target were EU citizens in general or monitored individuals are based in different countries. In such case, having a single representative based in any EU Member State covering the entire EU region seems the most logical approach, unless, there is a significant volume of services in a specific country – in which case it might be advisable to have a representative in such country as well and regardless of other representatives in other Member States.
What is the Representative’s main purpose?
The Representative shall be mandated by the controller or processor to be addressed in addition to or instead of the controller or the processor by, in particular, supervisory authorities and data subjects, on all issues related to processing, for the purposes of ensuring compliance with GDPR.
Again, and as mentioned above, it would be advisable that the foreign company issues a board resolution containing a complete and express mandate and/or empowerment to the EU Representative. Further, the foreign company shall make sure that it properly discloses the Representative’s contact details (e.g. in the company website, etc.) so that he or she can be easily reachable if necessary by authorities and other stakeholders. It is also important to note that the company would not be exempt from liability in case of the Representative’s breach of GDPR – despite the company might still have an action against the Representative depending on the contractual arrangements in place.
Are there any exemptions to the above requirement?
Yes, it is important to note that this requirement does not apply to data processing which: (i) is occasional; (ii) is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, taking into account the nature, context, scope and purposes of the processing; and (iii) it does not include, on a large scale, processing special categories of data e.g. ethnic origin, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, etc., or processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences. Nevertheless, some of the foregoing requirements are vague and difficult determine, which suggests appointing a Representative in any case in order to be on the safe side.
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
Administrative fines can reach, in the case of major breaches, up to 4% of the company’s global annual turnover or EUR 20 million. Further to imposing fines, EU authorities might opt to “name and shame” companies – just like UK’s ICO is successfully doing – in order to achieve a more effective prevention by threatening infringing companies’ reputation.
How enforceable is this regulation?
As we have seen, GDPR seems certainly determined to protect EU individuals beyond EU borders, but, does it really grant them a real protection mechanism?
Indeed, in case individuals feel that the non-EU data processor has breached GDPR, they have the choice to bring an action before the relevant supervisory authority or the courts of the EU Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment (e.g. where the representative is based) or where the data subject resides. This would practically mean that the infringing company’s EU representative will be served notice and represent the company in court.
Regarding the enforcement by regulatory authorities, the matter is less clear and still to be further specified probably when the implementation phase is approaching. However, I believe it would be challenging for EU authorities to sanction non-EU companies without proper facilitation through ad hoc bilateral or international agreements.
Conclusion
GDPR sets an unprecedented compliance threshold, to the extent that even non-EU companies are subjected to certain data protection compliance requirements.
Considering the incessant advancement of technology, data protection regulations will certainly remain and even be further enhanced. This means that companies must be aware of significant new regulatory developments occurring at a global scale and adjust their practices accordingly, not only to be compliant but also to stay competitive.